Post by account_disabled on Mar 5, 2024 23:03:18 GMT -7
Along with the epidemic, fear inevitably spreads and grows. It is not a novelty, in fact it is a constant that is mainly related to infectious diseases, while it is very little in relation to non-communicable diseases. The reason lies in the theory of risk communication, found in the history of public health, and confirmed by the current history of COVID-19. In a multitude of media interventions are found all the typical ingredients of epidemics: accusations, conspiracies, exploitation, unclear interests, a few trying to appease the many, and the many demanding cooperation and rationality in the face of complex scenarios (that somehow, no one can know them exhaustively).
Fears experienced in the distant Cambodia Telegram Number Data past (plague), more recent (smallpox) and which are never forgotten reappear. One by one, the elements that characterize risk perception appear, which must be considered in order to manage risk communication in a conscious way. They allow you to understand the differences between infectious and non-infectious diseases. The role of many social, cultural and contextual factors influencing the perception of risks is evident. As Andrea Cerase writes in his book "Risk and communication. Theory, models, problems" (2017), "The results of all the studies have allowed highlighting some main characteristics to explain the perception of risk and their impact on decision-making: familiarity, controllability, voluntary exposure, catastrophic potential, equality , immediacy of risk and level of knowledge".
According to this approach, risk perception is the subjective judgment people make about the characteristics, severity, and manner in which risk is managed. One of the main elements is the feeling of anger and indignation that provokes risk, anger, strictly related to trust in people / control bodies and familiarity of the context. Risk is proposed as a product of hazard and anger. Read also: 100 days after the start of the Israel-Hamas war, concerns about the expansion of the conflict Non-publication of Census data / Tabaku: Delays are hiding figures that no one likes Risk is understood as a probabilistic assessment (produced between the probability of the event occurring and the weight of possible damage).
Fears experienced in the distant Cambodia Telegram Number Data past (plague), more recent (smallpox) and which are never forgotten reappear. One by one, the elements that characterize risk perception appear, which must be considered in order to manage risk communication in a conscious way. They allow you to understand the differences between infectious and non-infectious diseases. The role of many social, cultural and contextual factors influencing the perception of risks is evident. As Andrea Cerase writes in his book "Risk and communication. Theory, models, problems" (2017), "The results of all the studies have allowed highlighting some main characteristics to explain the perception of risk and their impact on decision-making: familiarity, controllability, voluntary exposure, catastrophic potential, equality , immediacy of risk and level of knowledge".
According to this approach, risk perception is the subjective judgment people make about the characteristics, severity, and manner in which risk is managed. One of the main elements is the feeling of anger and indignation that provokes risk, anger, strictly related to trust in people / control bodies and familiarity of the context. Risk is proposed as a product of hazard and anger. Read also: 100 days after the start of the Israel-Hamas war, concerns about the expansion of the conflict Non-publication of Census data / Tabaku: Delays are hiding figures that no one likes Risk is understood as a probabilistic assessment (produced between the probability of the event occurring and the weight of possible damage).